Adding to Cart…
Licensing Agreement | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | EULA
© 2024 Daz Productions Inc. All Rights Reserved.You currently have no notifications.
Licensing Agreement | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | EULA
© 2024 Daz Productions Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Comments
Two prompts. Cat with wings in rainbow rain and pretty woman in sheer dress in rainbow rain
@Daventaki Wonderful rainbow ai effects! Makes me think of the Skittles "Touch the Rainbow" commercial :)
I have noticed that people's faces, especially the mouths, are lately super distorted. This can be seen on @FSMCDesigns beautiful Picnic scene at the bottom of page 12 when you zoom-in.
I noticed this happening to Daz AI Studio images that I tried to create with realistic humans in them. Previously, the AI Studio humans came out with realistic details, but shortly after the introduction of the following 2 products, the problem began:
1. LM Lowpi Lowpoly Figure
2. Crowd Generation For LM Lowpi Lowpoly Figure
I tried adding the following negative prompts, but they did not seem to have any affect on the distored human faces: -lowpi -lowpoly -"crowd creator"
If the Daz Team in charge of AI Studio could dial back the effect that these Low-Resolution products have, or give a toggle switch for the user to disable them, would be most appreciated.
My picnic image looked even worse before I enhacned it. I agree, the DAZ AI generator is really lacking when it comes to fine detail. I notice with the prompt strictness at 100%, the detail is very lacking, but more accurate. At 0% there is so much more detail, but less accuracy
I do not see much distortion on the face.
Maybe it depends on the prompt.
Another example...
And some Ladies - #1
#2
I think the issue is simple math. The length of time for generation seems to be 15-30 second range. If the AI is focusing on a single character the details are improved, on 2 characters it is distributed between the two.
Add 4 characters and the accuracy does begin to slip. 4 times the work but done in the same amount of time. there is more distortion, elongation, aberrant pixel.
Yes, you are right. Multiple figure scenes get more degraded in the details.
Crowdy place...
"Iridescent Synthwave #116460fe"
Driving off into the sunset...
#255c8fee
Great looking theme, @linvanchene
+ 1 , nice
A great series with great colours, Linvanchene!
Inspired by Bunyip02's prompt 'A monstrous, carnivorous plant that lures victims with sweet scents', I put the carnivorous plant in a jungle. Thank you, Bunyip02!
caravelle, that plant does look fascinating and dangerous.
"Synthwave Sailing #ee11c56c"
Some origami
Crickets
Hi,
I did some tests and I must say I'm surprised. What works one day may not work another. Interactions between characters.
The prompt “A wedding couple kisses under a brown moon, lace dress, embroidered suit” gives the image below. “Gay couple kisses at a Pride party” That works too. But impossible to go further with a quick ke "Michael and Sally kiss in the river, waterfall"
On the other hand, my attempts at combat scenes do not produce anything convincing.
When you say combat, do you mean, hand to hand grappling type combat, or more machine guns and battles?
romance
Could you find a different way to tag those that don't interfere so much with the image? It's just about impossible to appreciate the image with the extreme watermark. Is there not some less obtrusive way that you could mark those?
He is trying to prove a point that he is against AI and users shounld't enjoy images gemerated from it
Hi,
Thank you, for this image.
It is about to happen...
After wedding...
Racing in the future
FSMCDesigns, those faces do look great at that camera distance.
###
"Foggy Camping #49d32030"
Going for a hike.
At some point the fog may clear up.
The details on this one are so close! its a really good image.
A little hint of the batmobile with this one.