Daz Studio Iray - Rendering Hardware Benchmarking

1394041424345»

Comments

  • System/Mothboard : ASUS Prime X470-Pro, CPU AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

    GPU 1: RTX 4060 TI 16GB

    GPU 2: RTX 2060 12GB

    System Memory: 48GB DDR4

    Nvidia Studio Driver 546.01

    DAZ Studio 4.22.0.15 (latest Version)

    CUDA device 0 (NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti): 1800 iterations, 1.139s init, 201.437s render

    Total Rendering Time: 3 minutes 24.47 seconds

    That is really amazing and unexpectedly fast for this card. Its about 9 ITS. Is it due to the latest studio driver? When I got the card in November I achieved only 7,2 ITS. The paralell installed RTX 2060 rendered the scene in 8:02 Minutes with 3,75 ITS, just as expected. I wonder what results the new 4070 TI Super I ordered will bring. (will replace the 2060)

     

  • Matt_CastleMatt_Castle Posts: 2,645
    edited February 2024

    As I have a new RTX 4070 Ti Super ready to go into my system, I'm doing a fresh benchmark of my current RTX 3060 on the latest version of DS/Iray to use for a proper comparison.

    System Configuration
    System/Motherboard: ASUS TUF Gaming X570-Plus
    CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800x @ stock (Disabled for render)
    GPUs:
    ASUS RTX 3060 TUF GAMING OC
    12GB @ Stock
    GIGABYTE GTX 1650 OC Low Profile 4GB @ Stock (Monitor card, not used in render)
    System Memory: 2x 32GB Corsair Vengeance DDR4 @ 3600 MHz
    OS Drive: Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB M.2
    Asset Drive: Junctioned - Geometry on 2TB Samsung 870 QVO, Textures on 6TB Seagate IronWolf
    Power Supply: Corsair RM650x
    Operating System: Windows 10 Pro Build 19045
    Nvidia Drivers Version: 551.23
    Daz Studio Version: 4.22.1.58 Beta

    Benchmark Results
    2024-02-01 10:42:08.498 [INFO] :: Total Rendering Time: 4 minutes 47.81 seconds
    2024-02-01 10:50:53.124 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : CUDA device 0 (NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060): 1800 iterations, 1.050s init, 268.225s render

    Iteration Rate: 6.71 iterations per second
     

    Post edited by Matt_Castle on
  • Matt_CastleMatt_Castle Posts: 2,645

    And now with the one people probably care more about, the RTX 4070 Ti Super (which I believe is our first benchmark of one):

    System Configuration
    System/Motherboard: ASUS TUF Gaming X570-Plus
    CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800x @ stock (Disabled for render)
    GPUs:
    ASUS RTX 4070 Ti Super ProArt OC 16GB @ Stock
    GIGABYTE GTX 1650 OC Low Profile 4GB @ Stock (Monitor card, not used in render)
    System Memory: 2x 32GB Corsair Vengeance DDR4 @ 3600 MHz
    OS Drive: Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB M.2
    Asset Drive: Junctioned - Geometry on 2TB Samsung 870 QVO, Textures on 6TB Seagate IronWolf
    Power Supply: Corsair RM1000x
    Operating System: Windows 10 Pro Build 19045
    Nvidia Drivers Version: 551.23
    Daz Studio Version: 4.22.1.58 Beta

    Benchmark Results

    2024-02-01 12:32:02.644 [INFO] :: Total Rendering Time: 1 minutes 41.16 seconds
    2024-02-01 12:32:46.240 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : CUDA device 0 (NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER): 1800 iterations, 0.984s init, 98.888s render

    Iteration Rate: 18.2 iterations per second

  • GPU: ASUS RTX 4080 Super TUF 16GB @ Stock

    Daz Studio Version: 4.22.1.58 Beta

    Benchmark Results

    IRAY rend info: 1800 iterations, 0.812s init, 92.022s render

    Total Rendering Time: 1 minutes 33.39 seconds

    Iteration Rate: 19.56 iterations per second

  • Matt_CastleMatt_Castle Posts: 2,645
    edited February 2024

    Hmm - that makes me feel better about having to settle for the 4070 Ti Super rather than the 4080 Super, if there seems to be less than 10% in in the Iray performance.

    That does surprise me though, the specifications implied it would be more like a 20% jump. (I guess other system specs could be a factor here, but they are both ASUS cards from their somewhat premium lines).

    Post edited by Matt_Castle on
  • RaketeRakete Posts: 91
    edited February 2024

    Anyone here who has an AMD GPU willing to give this: 

    https://www.phoronix.com/review/radeon-cuda-zluda

    https://github.com/vosen/ZLUDA

    a try?

    Post edited by Rakete on
  • lorddayradonlorddayradon Posts: 471
    edited March 2024

    System Configuration
    System/Motherboard: Asus TUF 570-Plus
    CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8 Core - 16 CPU's 3.8 GHz 
    GPU: Asus TUF 4080 Super OC
    System Memory: G SKill F4.3600C17-16GTZR  (16G)
    OS Drive: WDS100T3X0C-00SJG0  (1TB m.3 WD Black)
    Asset Drive: Seagate IronWolf 8Tb NAS Internal Hard Drive HDD 3.5 7200RPM
    Power Supply: ROG-STRIX-1000G 80+ Gold
    Operating System: Windows 10 Pro ver: 22H2 build: 19045.4046
    Nvidia Drivers Version: 31.0.15.5161
    Daz Studio Version: 4.22.0.15 64Bit
    Optix Prime Acceleration: STATE (Daz Studio 4.12.1.086 or earlier only)

    Benchmark Results
    DAZ_STATS    2024-03-03 22:37:36.193 [INFO] :: Total Rendering Time: 1 minutes 34.83 seconds
    IRAY_STATS  2024-03-03 22:38:30.758 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : CUDA device 0 (NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER): 1800 iterations, 1.465s init, 91.023s render

    Iteration Rate: (19.775221647275963218087736066708) iterations per second

    Loading Time: ((TRT_HOURS * 3600 + TRT_MINUTES * 60 + TRT_SECONDS) - DEVICE_RENDER_TIME) seconds

    -Couldn't find any of this, nor any sections called DAZ_STATS/IRAY_STATS. So I grabbed what seemed pertinent.

     

    **It shoudl be noted that there are 3 monitors (4k +2x HD) connected, and I did leave/have some things running in tray which might skew the results a little.

    Post edited by lorddayradon on
  • chrislbchrislb Posts: 101

    Rakete said:

    Anyone here who has an AMD GPU willing to give this: 

    https://www.phoronix.com/review/radeon-cuda-zluda

    https://github.com/vosen/ZLUDA

    a try?

    I'm curious about how well it works.  The FAQ says that several 3D rendering applications and benchmarks have issues witht he software including V-Ray Octane and Cinebench.  I don't have any recent Radeon GPUs available to test it with.

  • RaketeRakete Posts: 91

    chrislb said:

    Rakete said:

    Anyone here who has an AMD GPU willing to give this: 

    https://www.phoronix.com/review/radeon-cuda-zluda

    https://github.com/vosen/ZLUDA

    a try?

    I'm curious about how well it works.  The FAQ says that several 3D rendering applications and benchmarks have issues witht he software including V-Ray Octane and Cinebench.  I don't have any recent Radeon GPUs available to test it with.

    There is a disscusion in the ZLUDA project where people are talking about running DAZ Studio: https://github.com/vosen/ZLUDA/discussions/83

  • chrislbchrislb Posts: 101

    I found this quote in Github link: "people are saying that Vluda will not run on Daz Studio/iRay because Vluda has no support for Optix."

  • chrislbchrislb Posts: 101

    I forgot that I had a GTX 1650 here that I could pop into a PC here to test. Here are the results.

    System Configuration:
    System/Motherboard: Asus ROG Zenith II Extreme Alpha
    CPU: AMD Threadripper 3970X stock speed
    GPU: EVGA GTX 1650 04G-P4-1257-KR
    System Memory: 128GB OLOy DDR4 @ 3600
    OS Drive: Crucial P5 Plus 1TB
    Asset Drive: Crucial P5 Plus 1TB 
    Power Supply: SuperFlower Leadex Platinum 1600 watt 
    Operating System: Windows 10 Pro OS Build 19045.4239
    Nvidia Drivers Version: 551.76
    Daz Studio Version: 4.22.0.16
    Optix Prime Acceleration: NA

    Benchmark Results
    Total Rendering Time: 17 minutes 23.90 seconds
    IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : CUDA device 0 (NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650): 1800 iterations, 0.846s init, 1041.068s render
    Iteration Rate: (1800/1041.068) = 1.729 iterations per second
    Loading Time: ((1043.90 seconds) - 1041.068) = 2.832seconds

  • ZoritaeZoritae Posts: 26

    2 x GPU GEFORCE RTX

     

    - Motherboard: Gigabyte Z790 Gaming X

     

    - CPU: MARCA MODELO @ VELOCIDAD/Stock : I9 13900kf 3Ghz

     

    - GPU1 MARCA MODELO @ VELOCIDAD/stock

    MSI GeForce RTX 4090 VENTUS 3X OC 24GB GDDR6X DLSS3

    - GPU2 PNY RTX 4090 VERTO 24GB GDDR6X PCIe4.

     

    RAM: 96 Gb CORSAIR VEGANCE 96 GB DDR5 5600

     

     

    HARD DISC:

    - WD BLACK SN770 2TB NVMe SSD 

    - Acer Predator GM7 4TB SSD M.2 PCI Express 4.0 NVMe

     

    POWER:

    - Corsair RMx Series RM1000x 1000W 80 Plus Gold Modular

    - MSI MPG A1000G PCIE5 1000W 80 Plus Gold Full Modular

     

    SO:  Windows 10 Pro for Workstations 22H2 64bits

     

     

    DRIVER Nvidia Versión: 555.85

     

     

    Studio Versión: VERSIÓN BITS:  4.22 64bits

     

    Optix Prime Aceleración: N/D

     

    BENCHMARDK RESULTS

    DAZ_STATS

    IRAY_STATS

     

    ITERATION RATE: [DEVICE_ITERATION_COUNT(suma de todos los valores) / DEVICE_RENDER_TIME_(valor más grande)] iteraciones por segundo

    LOADING TIME: [(TRT_HOURS * 3600 + TRT_MINUTES * 60 + TRT_SECONDS) - DEVICE_RENDER_TIME_(valor más grande)] segundos

     

    2024-06-23 10:23:57.580 [INFO] :: Finished Rendering

    2024-06-23 10:23:57.592 [INFO] :: Total Rendering Time: 40.79 seconds

    2024-06-23 10:24:08.946 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : Device statistics:

    2024-06-23 10:24:08.946 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : CUDA device 0 (NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090): 975 iterations, 0.667s init, 38.911s render

    2024-06-23 10:24:08.946 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : CUDA device 1 (NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090): 825 iterations, 0.872s init, 38.673s render

     

  • junkjunk Posts: 1,362
    edited December 2024

    Upgraded my four year 5600x CPU, motherboard on Cyber Monday Amaazon deal for CPU and "Like new" motherboard. 

    Now I have a i13700K that I am undervolting and power limiting to 150 watts.  Yes it's overclocked a little (see stats)


    System/Motherboard: MSI PRO Z690-A DDR4 ProSeries
    CPU: Intel Core i7-13700K @ 5.8Ghz on 2 cores
    GPU: RTX 4090 @ +25Mhz GPU, +1100 Memory
    System Memory: TEAMGROUP T-Force Delta RGB DDR4 128GB @ 3800Mhz
    OS Drive: SN850x / 4TB
    Asset Drive: S50l / 2TB
    Power Supply: be quiet! / Dark Power Pro 1200W
    Operating System: Windows 11 Pro / 24H2
    Nvidia Drivers Version: 566.14-desktop-win10-win11-64bit-international-dch-whql
    Daz Studio Version: 4.23.0.1 64bit
    Optix Prime Acceleration: N/A

    Benchmark Results
    2024-12-06 10:45:00.701 [INFO] :: Total Rendering Time: 1 minutes 5.96 seconds
    2024-12-06 10:45:51.270 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : CUDA device 0 (NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090): 1800 iterations, 0.777s init, 63.754s render

    Post edited by junk on
  • Anyone try with Daz Studio Premier? 

  • skyeshots said:

    Anyone try with Daz Studio Premier? 

    It is the same application, the Premier aspect is enabling some extra features and making available and enabling some additional plug-ins - nothing, currently at least, that directly affects rendering.

  • So I used to have a Z490 motherboard to mount 4080 to render at PCIE3 3.0 X4 (PCIE1 4.0 x8 for a 4090 for gaming) coupled wiht an Intel 10600. Recently I've upgraed to a MSI Z790 and 14900KF, sadly due to graphics card size I could only mount the 4080 on the PCIE 3.0 X1 and I was afraid I would have to experience longer render times but for those interested in this topic I can tell I have no worst render time. It takes a couple seconds more to load the scene sometimes compared to 4090 but I've gained even a few seconds. It may be due to the newwer drivers or Daz version, not sure.

     

    GPU: Zotac RTX 4080 16GB @ Stock

    Daz Studio Version: ? I can't remember, must be 4.20~ I made the tests at december 2022

    Benchmark Results with z490 PCIE 3.0 X4

    IRAY rend info: 1800 iterations, 2.105s init, 106.923s render

    Total Rendering Time: 1 minutes 50.59 seconds

     

    GPU: Zotac RTX 4080 16GB @ Stock

    Daz Studio Version: 4.23.0.3 Beta

    Benchmark Results with z790 PCIE 3.0 X1

    IRAY rend info: 1800 iterations, 1.795s init, 90.677s render

    Total Rendering Time: 1 minutes 34.4

     

  • jellyjelly Posts: 0

    RTX 5090 benchmarks imminent I presume?

  • chrislbchrislb Posts: 101

    jelly said:

    RTX 5090 benchmarks imminent I presume?

    Does the version of Iray in Daz even support the RTX 5000 series? 

  • Richard HaseltineRichard Haseltine Posts: 102,291

    chrislb said:

    jelly said:

    RTX 5090 benchmarks imminent I presume?

    Does the version of Iray in Daz even support the RTX 5000 series? 

    No, apparently we will have to wait until the next major version of DS to use the 50x0 series cards. 2024.0 had bugs, and so will not be integrated with DS, while 2024.1 is using a different, incompatible C++ compiler/library that means it cannot work in DS 4.x.x.x

  • bluejauntebluejaunte Posts: 1,910
    edited 2:47AM

    Richard Haseltine said:

    chrislb said:

    jelly said:

    RTX 5090 benchmarks imminent I presume?

    Does the version of Iray in Daz even support the RTX 5000 series? 

    No, apparently we will have to wait until the next major version of DS to use the 50x0 series cards. 2024.0 had bugs, and so will not be integrated with DS, while 2024.1 is using a different, incompatible C++ compiler/library that means it cannot work in DS 4.x.x.x

    Are you saying Daz Studio 5? Surely not right...
    Post edited by bluejaunte at
Sign In or Register to comment.