Loading...
> >

Bryce 7 Pro Rendering Benchmarks

dunestrider_b1b336e4aedunestrider_b1b336e4ae Posts: 10
edited January 2018 in Bryce Discussion

Has anyone ever done rendering benchmarks using Bryce (i.e., comparing different computer models and operating systems)?

I use my main computer to work with developing a Bryce file, then pass that file to another computer for the rendering process. I am curious as to what is the ideal setup for the rendering machine: Mac or Windows, processor type, memory, etc.

Here is what I have found with the computers I have:

  1. Mac Pro 2.8 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon, 16 GB RAM, Mac OS X 10.6.8:    4:20
  2. Mac Mini 2.53 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 4 GB RAM, Mac OS X 10.6.8:      13:43
  3. Mac Mini 2 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo , 2 GB RAM, Mac OS X 10.6.8:        19:49
  4. Power Mac 1.8 Ghz Dual PowerPC G5, 1 GB RAM, Mac OS X 10.4.11:   29:50
  5. Mac Mini 1.42 GHz PowerPC G4, 1 GB RAM, Mac OS X 10.5.8:      1:15:31
  6. IBM NetVista, 1.8 GHz Pentium 4, 1 GB RAM, Windows XP:             1:20:50

Bryce is the only application running when I did these tests. I thought the PowerPC would give more "bang for the buck", but that does not seem to be the case.

It would be great if others could try this and post their results.

Attached is the benchmark file I used, Bryce_Benchmark.br7. It is a simple mirror ball on a water plane, only 74 KB.

zip
zip
Bryce_Benchmark.zip
57K
Post edited by dunestrider_b1b336e4ae on

Comments

  • StuartBStuartB Posts: 596
    edited December 2017

    Windows 7 Pro 64 Bit. 4 Gig Ram. Core 2 Quad 2.6 Ghz Processor.

     

     

     

    Untitled.jpg
    358 x 353 - 33K
    Post edited by StuartB on
  • ed3Ded3D Posts: 2,222

    Processor:  Xeon Quad Core @ 2.66 GHz
    RAM_Memory: 4 GB
    OS: 32-bit Windows Vista Business
    _``~...

    BRYC-BNKMRK-1-F.jpg
    520 x 441 - 21K
  • HoroHoro Posts: 10,712

    0:05:13 - ex58ud3r Win 7, i7 920 2.67 GHz 4 hyperthreaded cores (0:06:21 normal priority)
    0:07:55 - dh55tc Win 7, i3 550 3.2 GHz, 4 cores (*)
    0:43:06 - foxconn Win XP pro, Pentium D 3.4 GHz, 2 cores
    3:07:45 - aspire1 Win XP home, Atom N270 1.6 GHz, 2 cores (netbook)
    1:31:15 - laptorn1 Win 2000 pro, Celeron 2.6 GHz, 1 core (laptop)

    (*) Note: Win7 uses 1 core (25%) for the svchost (netsvcs) service. This was suspended for the test; if enabled, render time is 0:10:23).

    I have render test results for Bryce 5.0, 5.5, 6.0 and 6.1 for 22 computers and test results for Bryce 7.1 for 6 computers of the 22 for low, normal and high priority. The Bryce 5 test file is available as well on my test site. The link is on top tight on the homepage of my website. The direct link is http://horo.dyndns.org:82/MyWeb/public/Web/index.html available daily from around 08:45 to 21:30 UTC (Tuesdays starting at around 10:00 UTC).

  • StuartBStuartB Posts: 596

    Wow Horo. 3:07:45 - aspire1 Win XP home, Atom N270 1.6 GHz, 2 cores (netbook)

    Are you sure that netbook runs on electricity and is not really clockwork. :)

     

  • HoroHoro Posts: 10,712

    Yes Stuart, I was also surprised to have to wait all morning, I though the Win 2000 laptop would be the slowest. But then, Aspire is a netbook and the CPU clock is only about half of the laptop. And yeah, it run on mains power, not on battery.

  • MelanieLMelanieL Posts: 7,424
    edited December 2017

    Windows 7 Pro, Pentium i7-3770 (3.40 GHz), 4 cores (8 logical processors), 32 GB RAM (not that Bryce can see all that, I don't even have LAA in use).

    ETA: Also with only Bryce running at the time.

    Bryce_Benchmark.jpg
    419 x 457 - 37K
    Post edited by MelanieL on
  • HansmarHansmar Posts: 2,949
    edited December 2017

    I did not close any background running programme, but had no other window open.

    Set-up: 

    Windows 10, i7-4750 HQ, 2.00 GHz (quad-core), 8 GB RAM

     

    benchmark.JPG
    396 x 420 - 32K
    Post edited by Hansmar on
  • SlepalexSlepalex Posts: 911
    edited December 2017

    Win Xp SP 2 (32bit), Intel(R) Core (TM)2 Quad CPU Q9450 @ 2.666Ghz 4 Gb
    Render time: 07:20

    Буфер обмена01.jpg
    342 x 343 - 31K
    Post edited by Slepalex on
  • c-ramc-ram Posts: 376

    Win7 professional 64 bits.

    4 physicals 4 logicals cores watercooled Intel i7 4790k O.C @ 4.2ghz.

    32Gb system memory : 02:42

     

    Right now I am building a new i7 7820x 16 cores machines,

    I will make the test with 8 physicals cores when comes the time.

    bryce bench.jpg
    386 x 422 - 107K
  • S RayS Ray Posts: 399

    win 10 64 bit OS, Intel Core i5-4460 CPU @3.20GHZ   3.20GHz   32GB RAM

    BeanchMark.jpg
    310 x 312 - 65K
  • c-ramc-ram Posts: 376
    edited January 2018

    Windows 10 64 bit OS,

    Intel Core i7-7820 skylake X 16 ways water-cooled CPU (8 physicals 8 logicals cores) @ 4.0 Ghz, 32Gb RAM.

    Bryce Bench.jpg
    403 x 512 - 60K
    Post edited by c-ram on
  • Peter FulfordPeter Fulford Posts: 1,325
    edited January 2018

    Windows 7 Pro 64bit
    Intel i7 3930K - 6 cores (+6 virtual) @ 4.25Ghz (custom watercooled) 16Gb RAM
    Render time: 02.19

     

     

    brycebench.jpg
    377 x 401 - 33K
    Post edited by Peter Fulford on
  • Ciprian DughirCiprian Dughir Posts: 1

    MacMini Late 2012, i7 (quad core) 2.3 GHz (3.2 GHz turbospeed), 16GB Ram, Windows 10 Enterprise 64 bit.

    Render time: 3:58

    Bryce 7 pro benchmark - mac mini 2012 i72_3GHz 16gb ram.png
    1152 x 648 - 50K
Sign In or Register to comment.